
Evidence vs Marketing
Can Radiofrequency Melt Facial Fat? What the Evidence Shows
Can radiofrequency melt facial fat? What studies show on at-home RF, RF microneedling and mre
Evidence-based analyses on aesthetic medicine in Europe.
Our Insights explore research trends, ethics, safety, emerging technologies, and cross-border perspectives — with a focus on responsibility, transparency, and patient-centered practice.

Evidence vs Marketing
Can radiofrequency melt facial fat? What studies show on at-home RF, RF microneedling and mre

Evidence vs Marketing
Do home RF devices work? We compare studies of NEWA, Silk’n, AMIRO, TriPollar, LG and CurrentBody—results, safety, funding and evidence gaps.

GLP-1
What causes Ozempic face: GLP-1 medication or substantial weight loss? We examine facial volume loss and what the research actually shows.

Anti-Aging
CO2 laser vs fractional CO2 explained: how fully ablative and fractional treatments differ in downtime, risks, pigmentation, results and recovery.

Evidence vs Marketing
Dark circles aren't one problem — they're three. An evidence-based guide to what actually works, what doesn't, and what can harm your eyes.

Analytics
Ozempic and GLP-1 drugs are reshaping aesthetic demand — from "Ozempic face" to fat banking. What patients now want, and why fillers alone won't fix.

Longevity Aesthetics
Longevity aesthetics explained clearly: what it means, which treatments have evidence, and how patients can tell real skin longevity from marketing.

Patient behavior
Why most aesthetic marketing advice describes a patient your clinic doesn't have — and where the considered, high-ticket patient actually decides.

Photoprotection
SPF measures UVB only. Most people apply too little. Peer-reviewed research on sun protection, UVA gaps, chemical filters and the natural oil myth.

Psychology of aesthetics
Is beauty really a personal preference? Neuroscience, perception, social networks and self-esteem: what the research shows.

Evidence vs Marketing
PDRN from salmon DNA is trending in K-beauty serums and clinic injectables. We reviewed the PubMed evidence for topical and injectable use. Here's the truth.

Evidence vs Marketing
97% of before-and-after photos in aesthetic medicine are biased. An investigation into how images are manipulated, the patient cost, and where it's already illegal.

Evidence vs Marketing
Review exosome-based products: serums and treatments in the clinic, real ingredients, sources of exosomes, EU/US regulatory status and what really works.

Evidence vs Marketing
Essais cliniques, réglementation, sécurité et limites réelles des soins à exosomes face au marketing.

Evidence vs Marketing
Do LED masks really work? Scientific analysis of red light, effective doses, clinical limitations, and marketing.

Ethics & Practice
An in-depth editorial on the hidden pressures shaping aesthetic medicine today: social media–driven expectations, ethical dilemmas, and clinical responsibility.

Evidence vs Marketing
Collagen and funding bias: why the benefits disappear in independent studies. Critical analysis based on 2025 research.

Evidence vs Marketing
Why expensive retinol serums rely on little clinical evidence, while prescription retinoids are rigorously studied.

Analysis
An evidence-based analysis of Belgium’s aesthetic medicine research in 2025, comparing France and the Netherlands, with a focus on ethics, safety, psychology, and AI.

Partner Feature
Home RF devices: do they actually work? We review the clinical evidence for radiofrequency skin tightening, what the research shows for home devices, and whether CurrentBody's RF device delivers on its claims.