Heading

Buttock Augmentation (Implants)  in Belgium:What to Expect & Where to Find Trusted Providers

Thinking about a Buttock Augmentation (Implants)? This guide explains how it works, what results to expect, and where to find experienced providers in Belgium.

Quick FAQ ↘

Buttock augmentation with implants is an aesthetic surgery procedure aimed at increasing the volume and projection of the buttocks when available fat volume is insufficient or when the patient seeks a more structured and predictable result. Unlike fat grafting (BBL), this technique relies on the implantation of solid silicone prostheses, with specific indications, benefits and risks.

Clinical indications for buttock augmentation with implants

Buttock augmentation with implants: medical indications

This surgery may be considered when:

  • the patient presents with insufficient buttock volume with little mobilisable fat,
  • a loss of projection exists despite stable weight,
  • a stable result not dependent on fat gain is desired,
  • reconstructive or secondary surgery is necessary following failed fat grafting,
  • the patient seeks maximum predictability of the final result.

Implants are particularly indicated in slim or very athletic patients who do not have sufficient fat for effective fat transfer.

How buttock augmentation with implants works

Surgical principle of buttock implants

The procedure involves creating a surgical pocket in the buttock region to insert a solid cohesive silicone implant, specifically designed to withstand the mechanical stress associated with sitting and muscle contraction.

Types and characteristics of buttock implants

The implants used are high-density cohesive silicone prostheses, different from breast implants due to their increased resistance to compression.

Available shapes:

  • Round: overall and homogeneous volume increase
  • Anatomical oval: targeted projection with more natural shape

Volumes: generally 200 to 600 cc depending on the patient's morphology, soft tissue thickness and desired result.

The volume and shape are chosen before the procedure during consultation, based on precise anthropometric measurements and muscle thickness. This selection allows for result predictability, unlike fat grafting where part of the injected fat may resorb variably.

Surgical techniques for buttock augmentation with implants

Buttock implants: operative techniques

Implant placement plane

Clinical studies describe several possible surgical planes:

  • Intramuscular plane: the implant is placed inside the gluteus maximus muscle (most commonly used technique currently)
  • Submuscular plane: the implant is positioned beneath the muscle
  • Subfascial plane: the implant is placed above the muscle (technique associated with more complications)

Surgical data show that the intramuscular plane offers the best implant coverage, reduces palpability and presents lower complication rates than superficial planes.

Surgical approach

  • Single incision in the median intergluteal fold (4 to 6 cm)
  • Sometimes double incision depending on the chosen technique and patient anatomy

The scar is concealed in the natural fold between the buttocks, making it minimally visible after complete healing.

Course of the procedure

  • Duration: 2 to 3 hours depending on complexity
  • Anaesthesia: general anaesthesia required
  • Hospitalisation: 1 to 2 nights depending on the surgeon's protocol and postoperative progress
  • Technique: pocket creation, implant insertion, meticulous closure in several layers with temporary drainage

Preparation and postoperative recovery

Before and after buttock augmentation with implants

Before the procedure

  • Smoking cessation recommended at least 4 weeks before surgery
  • Complete preoperative assessment (blood tests, anaesthesia consultation)
  • Precise evaluation of skin and muscle quality
  • Thorough discussion of realistic expectations and implant choice
  • Photographic planning and anthropometric measurements

Detailed recovery protocol

Weeks 1 to 3:

  • Direct sitting position strictly limited or with specific pressure-relief cushion
  • Sleep only on stomach or side
  • Time off work recommended (except standing telework)
  • Light walking authorised from day 2 to promote circulation
  • Wearing compressive compression garment
  • Pain controlled by appropriate analgesics

Weeks 4 to 6:

  • Gradual return to normal sitting position
  • Return to usual daily activities
  • Light physical activities authorised (walking, gentle activities)
  • No intense sport or weight training yet

Week 8 onwards:

  • Complete return to sport (running, weight training, contact sports)
  • Final result visible between 3 and 6 months after complete oedema resolution
  • Regular follow-up with surgeon to monitor implant position and condition

Results, timelines and clinical efficacy

Results of buttock augmentation with implants

Surgical publications show:

  • Immediately visible volume from leaving the operating theatre
  • Initial swelling phase during the first 2 to 4 weeks
  • Result stabilisation after the initial inflammatory phase (approximately 3 months)
  • Long-term volume durability, the implant not resorbing unlike fat grafting where 20 to 40% of injected fat may disappear

Patient satisfaction

Overall satisfaction is high in published series, with patients particularly appreciating the predictability and permanence of the result. Main satisfaction factors include improved silhouette in clothing and stable projection over time.

Long-term results

Buttock implants are designed to last many years. Unlike old-generation breast implants, modern cohesive silicone buttock implants show excellent durability. Replacement may however be necessary in case of complication, displacement or simply if the patient wishes to modify the volume after several years.

Possible complications of buttock implants

Risks and complications of buttock augmentation with implants

Complications reported in clinical analyses include:

Early complications:

  • Wound dehiscence: 15 to 30% in historical series, reduced to less than 10% with intramuscular plane and modern protocols. Treatment by local care, rarely reoperation.
  • Seroma: fluid accumulation around the implant in 5 to 15% of cases according to studies. Generally resolvable spontaneously or by simple aspiration.
  • Haematoma: postoperative bleeding sometimes requiring drainage.
  • Infection: 2 to 8% of cases. May require prolonged antibiotic treatment, or even temporary implant removal followed by delayed reimplantation.

Late complications:

  • Implant displacement: less than 5% of cases with adequate fixation and compliance with postoperative protocol. Requires repositioning surgery.
  • Excessive implant palpability: depends on chosen plane and patient tissue thickness.
  • Painful fibrous capsule: formation of tissue envelope around the implant that may create discomfort.
  • Asymmetry: may require surgical revision.
  • Need for revision surgery: estimated at 5 to 15% of patients within the first 5 years.

Overall complication rates are higher than for isolated fat grafting, which underscores the importance of rigorous patient selection and expert surgical technique.

Contraindications to buttock augmentation with implants

When to avoid buttock implants

Absolute contraindications

  • Active or chronic infections in the buttock region
  • Severe uncontrolled healing disorders
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Active autoimmune diseases affecting healing
  • General health condition incompatible with general anaesthesia

Relative contraindications

  • Active smoking (significantly increases risk of healing complications)
  • Very high or very low body mass index
  • Unrealistic expectations regarding the result
  • Insufficient soft tissue quality (very thin skin, atrophied muscle)
  • History of radiotherapy in the buttock region
  • Significant weight instability

A complete medical evaluation determines whether the patient is a good candidate for this procedure.

Buttock implants vs Brazilian Butt Lift: what's the difference

Understanding the two approaches to buttock augmentation

Buttock implants and the Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) are two distinct techniques addressing different needs. Understanding their differences allows choosing the most suitable approach for each situation.

Volume source and result nature

Augmentation with implants relies on inserting a solid silicone prosthesis, whilst the BBL uses the patient's autologous fat harvested by liposuction. This fundamental difference influences all other aspects of the procedure.

With implants, the volume is immediate and predictable: the surgeon knows exactly what the final result will be from implant selection. With BBL, part of the injected fat (generally 20 to 40%) resorbs in the months following the procedure, making the final result less predictable.

Evolution over time

Implants offer stable and permanent volume. They do not change with weight variations, which can be an advantage for some patients seeking a constant result, but a disadvantage for others wishing natural evolution.

BBL, using living fat, follows weight variations: transferred fat increases or decreases like the body's native fat. Some patients appreciate this natural adaptation, others prefer implant stability.

Touch sensation and natural appearance

Autologous BBL fat offers a very natural sensation to the touch, indistinguishable from normal buttock tissue. Implants, whilst increasingly sophisticated, may sometimes be palpable, particularly in very slim patients or depending on the chosen placement plane.

Natural visual appearance depends more on surgical technique and chosen volume than on the method itself. Well-placed implants can give a very natural result, just as BBL can appear artificial if volumes are excessive.

Ideal candidates for each technique

Implants are particularly suitable for slim or very athletic patients with little available fat for transfer, those seeking maximum predictability, or those having already undergone BBL without satisfactory result.

BBL is better suited to patients with sufficient mobilisable fat (storage areas in abdomen, flanks, thighs), those wishing to combine body remodelling and buttock augmentation, or those preferring to avoid a foreign body.

Course and recovery

Procedure duration is generally shorter for implants (2-3 hours) than for BBL (3-4 hours including liposuction).

Social downtime is comparable: approximately 3 to 4 weeks for implants with strict sitting position limitation, 2 to 3 weeks for BBL with the same restrictions to protect transferred fat.

Postoperative pain is often more pronounced with implants due to muscle dissection, whilst BBL combines discomfort from liposuction areas and the buttock region.

Specific risks

Implants present risks related to prosthetic material: infection potentially requiring implant removal, displacement, rupture (rare with modern implants), and fibrous capsule formation.

BBL carries a specific and serious risk: fat embolism, although rare when technique is respected (injection only into subcutaneous fatty tissue, never into muscle).

Combined approach

Some surgeons propose a composite approach combining implant and fat grafting to optimise the result: the implant provides projection and structural volume, whilst fat grafting refines contours and improves transition with adjacent areas.

Which technique to choose

The choice between implants and BBL should not be dictated by general preferences but by individualised assessment taking into account patient morphology, aesthetic objectives, medical history and risk tolerance. A thorough consultation with a surgeon experienced in both techniques allows determining the most suitable approach.

Price of buttock augmentation with implants in Belgium

Cost of buttock implant surgery

Price range in Belgium

The cost of buttock augmentation with implants in Belgium is generally between £5,900 and £7,500 for the complete procedure.

This range includes:

  • Surgical fees
  • Anaesthesia fees
  • Clinic and hospitalisation costs (1-2 nights)
  • Implant cost
  • Initial postoperative follow-up

Elements influencing the price

Several factors explain price variations:

  • Implant quality and brand: latest generation implants are more expensive
  • Surgeon's experience: specialist surgeons with recognised expertise charge higher fees
  • Clinic standard: the most recent or prestigious establishments have higher rates
  • Technique complexity: intramuscular plane and certain sophisticated approaches may increase cost
  • Associated procedures: if complementary fat grafting or refinement liposuction is performed simultaneously

Financial details

These rates exclude potential additional fees and additional costs (medicines, specific compression garments, follow-up consultations beyond the standard protocol).

Buttock augmentation with implants being an aesthetic surgery procedure, it is not reimbursed by Belgian health insurance, except in exceptional cases of reconstruction following trauma or documented congenital malformation.

Frequently asked questions about buttock augmentation with implants

Is the buttock implant visible or palpable to the touch?

Implant palpability depends primarily on the placement plane and your tissue thickness. With an intramuscular plane (current reference technique), the implant is covered by the gluteus maximus muscle, which considerably reduces palpability. In very slim patients with little adipose tissue, slight palpability may remain at the implant edges, particularly in standing position bent forward. In patients with normal muscle and fatty coverage, the implant is generally non-palpable and the result indistinguishable to the touch from natural augmentation.

Can buttock implants move after the procedure?

Implant displacement remains possible but rare (less than 5% of cases) when surgical technique is rigorous and postoperative protocol respected. Displacement generally occurs in the first months if the patient resumes intense physical activities too early or does not respect sitting position restrictions. Creating a precise surgical pocket adapted to implant size, sometimes combined with fixation sutures, minimises this risk. In case of confirmed displacement, repositioning surgery is necessary to restore symmetry and aesthetics.

What is the real lifespan of a buttock implant?

Modern cohesive silicone buttock implants are designed to last very many years, potentially a lifetime. Unlike old liquid silicone breast implants that required systematic replacement, current buttock implants have no predefined limited lifespan. Replacement may however prove necessary in case of complication (infection, displacement, rupture), significant morphological change in the patient (massive weight gain or loss), or if the patient simply wishes to modify volume after several years. Long-term follow-up studies show that the majority of patients retain their implants without problem for 10 to 15 years or more.

Can implants and fat grafting really be combined during the same procedure?

Yes, this composite approach is increasingly used by specialist surgeons and is the subject of scientific publications. The principle involves placing the implant to create projection and basic structural volume, then performing peripheral fat grafting to refine contours, improve transitions with adjacent regions (lower back, upper thighs) and give a more natural and harmonious appearance. This combination allows benefiting from implant predictability and stability whilst enjoying fat grafting naturalness for finishing touches. It is particularly indicated in patients with moderate fat volume, insufficient for BBL alone but allowing complementary refinement.

What happens if I wish to remove my implants later?

Buttock implant removal is technically possible at any time. The procedure, performed under general anaesthesia, involves reopening the initial incision, removing the implant and any fibrous capsule, then closing the pocket. After removal, the buttock region generally returns to an appearance close to that before implantation, although slight ptosis (sagging) may occur if implants were large and worn for a long time. In some cases, complementary corrective surgery may be necessary to optimise the result: buttock lift, fat grafting to compensate for volume loss, or liposuction of adjacent areas to harmonise the silhouette. The surgeon assesses during the removal consultation potentially necessary associated procedures.

Can the implant rupture like a breast implant?

Modern cohesive silicone buttock implants present a much lower rupture risk than old liquid silicone breast implants. Cohesive silicone (semi-solid gel) cannot leak even in case of envelope rupture, unlike liquid silicone which could migrate into tissues. Rupture remains theoretically possible in case of violent direct trauma (car accident, significant fall), but remains exceptional in routine practice. In case of suspected rupture, an MRI confirms diagnosis, and implant replacement is then recommended, although urgency is less than with old liquid implants thanks to the cohesive nature of the gel.

What happens in case of pregnancy after buttock implant placement?

Pregnancy is not contraindicated after buttock implant placement and presents no particular risk for either mother or baby. Implants, located in the buttock region, do not interfere with pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding. Weight gain during pregnancy may temporarily modify buttock appearance, but implants themselves do not change volume. After delivery and pregnancy weight loss, buttock appearance generally returns to its previous state. It is recommended to wait at least 6 to 12 months after implant placement before considering pregnancy, to allow complete and stable healing.

Sources et références médicales

  • Sharma M, Wakure A. Scar revision. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013 May;46(2):408-18.
  • Shockley WW. Scar revision techniques: z-plasty, w-plasty, and geometric broken line closure. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Aug;19(3):455-63.
  • Papadakis M, Chrisostomidis C, Nikolidakis A, et al. W-plasty in Scar Revision: Geometrical Considerations and Suggestions for Site-specific Design Modifications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):e2203.
  • Zito PM, Jawad BA, Hohman MH, Mazzoni T. Z-Plasty. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  • Rodgers BJ, Williams EF, Hove CR. W-plasty and geometric broken line closure. Facial Plast Surg. 2001 Nov;17(4):239-44.
  • Gupta S, Garg S, Dahiya N. Surgical scar revision: an overview. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014 Jan;7(1):3-13.
  • Skochdopole A, Dibbs RP, Sarrami SM, Dempsey RF. Scar Revisions. Semin Plast Surg. 2021 May;35(2):130-138.
  • Goslawski A, Tranchito E, Rabbani CC. Insights on in-office scar revision and resurfacing procedures. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul;9(3):249-256.
  • Wallace HJ, Basehore BM. Wound Healing Phases. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  • Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Skin scarring. BMJ. 2003 Jan;326(7380):88-92.
  • Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008 May;453(7193):314-21.
  • Ogawa R. Surgery for scar revision and reduction: from primary closure to flap surgery. Burns Trauma. 2019 Mar;7:7.
  • Brown BC, McKenna SP, Siddhi K, et al. The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Sep;61(9):1049-58.
  • Khansa I, Harrison B, Janis JE. Evidence-based scar management: how to improve results with technique and technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3 Suppl):165S-178S.
  • Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):560-71.
  • Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ, et al. Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Aug;67(8):1017-25.
  • Verhaegen PD, van Zuijlen PP, Pennings NM, et al. Differences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: An objective histopathological analysis. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):649-56.
  • Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, et al. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1-2):113-25.
  • Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun;10:e43.
  • Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5.

Medical Disclaimer
This article is intended for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. It is based on peer-reviewed medical research, clinical guidelines, and expert-reviewed medical literature to provide clear, reliable, and up-to-date information for patients. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or treatment.
We do not promote any specific treatment, product, or provider, and there are no conflicts of interest influencing the content.
All before-and-after photos shown on this page are licensed stock images intended for illustrative purposes only. They do not depict actual patients of the surgeons listed on our site. Results may vary based on individual anatomy and treatment plans.

Buttock Augmentation (Implants) peut aider à corriger :

When is it helpful?
Dr. Alexis VERPAELE

Dr. Alexis VERPAELE

Rated 4.5 out of 5 on Google
4.5
en
nl
Coupure Rechts 164C/D, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
View map
Dr. Patrick TONNARD

Dr. Patrick TONNARD

Rated 3.9 out of 5 on Google
3.9
nl
Coupure Rechts 164, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
View map
Dr. Joan VANDEPUTTE

Dr. Joan VANDEPUTTE

Rated 3.6 out of 5 on Google
3.6
nl
Meerspoort 31, 9700 Oudenaarde, Belgium
View map
Dr. Serge VAN CANNEYT

Dr. Serge VAN CANNEYT

Rated 3.3 out of 5 on Google
3.3
nl
Maaltebruggestraat 288 9000 Ghent, Belgium
View map
Show more
View Profile
Close

Buttock Augmentation (Implants) in the major cities of Belgium

No items found.